Así parece ser la ecuación, al menos en el canal 12 de TV Tokyo, puesto que no interrumpieron ni retrasaron la emisión del episodio 04 de Slayers Revolution la semana pasada cuando ocurrió un sismo de 6.8 grados en Japón. La imagen muestra lo que emitían diversos canales de televisión minutos después del siniestro.
Inesperadamente Slayers Revolution ha decaído enormemente en los ratings, comenzando con un muy respetable 2.5% de share y descendiendo hasta un 0.8%, casi en el último lugar, a pesar de tratarse de una franquicia con muchos años de solidez. Por comparar, Antique Bakery concentra un 3.0% de share y sólo lleva un manga a cuestas.
So, by this you are saying that slayers lost popularity just because in japan was a earthqueake 6.8 at the same time slayers was playing?? Japan people are stupid or what? they are inteligent people and not stop doing something for something like this.
I did like to know who is so STUPID to relate slayers to the earthquake.
I’ll assume you said that because spanish is not your native language and you didn’t understand what I said. You should know that the last paragraph, the one that is under that picture, is not referring at all to the earthquake. I’ll translate the article for you:
Slayers Revolution > Japanese Earthquake
It seems to be the equation here, at least in TV Tokyo (Channel 12), because they didn’t pause the broadcast of the fourth episode of Slayers Revolution last week, when a 6.8º earthquake hit Japan. The image shows what TV Tokyo and other channels were broadcasting at the time of the incident.
(Image goes here)
Unexpectedly, Slayers Revolution fell down the rating charts this month, because it started with a respectable 2.5% and is now 0.8%, nearly in the bottom of the pile, even though is a very solid franchise. Even newcomer manga to anime conversion Antique Bakery is holding 3.0%.
So, you see, my comment over the ratings of Slayers Revolution has nothing to do with the eartquake, I just happened to place the comment in the post because I didn’t feel that I should’ve make another post just to comment on that remark.
I guess now you’ll be able to really understand this article, and see for yourself that in no way I was comparing rating drops with natural incidents.
Should you have any doubts about this, feel free to comment again.